Adam’s privates

Answer me this!

Have you ever seen a picture of Adam, in the nude?

I mean TOTALLY in the nude??

Well I haven’t either!!

I was in the National Gallery there recently, and despite the fact that I’ve visited hundreds of times before, this was the first occasion I actually noticed that in each and every painting where Adam was featured, the ubiquitous fig-leaf or foliage was in full bloom.

Well this made me very curious, indeed!

What had Adam got, that the rest of us haven’t?

I knew that you’d be absolutely dying to know, as well.

And so, at enormous expense, I have undertaken a huge amount of research and homework on your behalf.


==============================================

Well, I’ve got startling news for you!

I have just discovered, that the fig leaf and/or the shrubbery, which Adam traditionally wears in every painting of him, hides much more than his naughty bits.

In fact it raises questions which are mind boggling in their significance and agonizing in their ambiguity.

Indeed, it raises questions about our very existence.

My proposition is this –

That the shrubbery was there, as much to hide his naughty bits, as it was to conceal that other VITAL issue!

Did Adam have a navel?

Think about it!

This is truly of immense importance and significance.

He was created by God, not born of a woman, and therefore did not require a remnant of a umbilical cord!

Yet, as God intended to create a prototype, a MAN upon whom the rest of us would be modeled –

would he not make this first man like the rest to follow?

In other words, would He not create Adam with the APPEARANCE of pre-existence?

In the absence of any guidelines on this vital issue, most of the painters literally hedged their bets, they ran for cover!

=======================================


According to Genesis the Earth is just a few thousand years old –

If this is true - then where did all the fossils come from?

One explanation is that God created the Earth with the appearance of pre-existence – just like Adam’s navel.

In other words, the question of Adam’s navel, or lack of one, raises other thorny issues.

Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

Or, even more perplexing – which came first, the tin or the tin-opener?

Well, as you all know, the battle between the Evolutionists and the Evangelists has waged for centuries.

You probably know that Dr. William Reville writes a science column in the Times every Monday and even he, a man of great knowledge and understanding had to admit that when it comes to evolution – he’s flummoxed!!

And if Bill Reville is bamboozled, what hope is there for the rest of us?

All of the scientific evidence indicates an evolutionary process which took millions and millions of years for us to arrive on the scene,

- the first wiggley things started to squirm about 4.6 billion years ago, while the Old Testament clearly indicates only a few thousand years since the creation.

The best compromise reached, so far, by both sides in the argument is to say that God undertook the business of creation in two phases. With, perhaps, millions of years between those two phases.

That is to say that He created the World, allowed the evolutionary process to begin, and at the stage where man had matured to the state of becoming - forgive me - a Homo Erectus, He infused a soul into a man and called him Adam.

And again, while this allows both sides off the hook, to some extent, it does indicate that Adam MUST have had a navel!

And yet, if he was created by God, why would he need one???

George Wald (the American Biologist, and Nobel prize winner) said, and I’m inclined to agree with him –

"We are the products of editing – rather than authorship"

While, Sir Thomas Browne, as a metaphor for original sin said "the man without a navel yet lives in me"

And, James Joyce in Ulysses writes "Heve, naked Eve, She had no navel"

D’ya see what I mean? Evolutionists and Evangelists.

I’ve had countless sleepless nights trying, on your behalf, to get to the bottom of this mystery.

And I’ve had to give up. I’ve had to throw in the towel, so to speak.

In other words, despite all my best efforts, I don’t have an answer.


=========================================

I’m reminded of the story of a Grey-bearded man/God sitting on a throne, surrounded by fluttering cherubs.

He says, in His loud booming voice - "I’ve just created this 24 hour period, alternating between light and darkness"

And one of the cherubs asks, "what are you going to do now?"

And He says – "I think I’ll call it a day!"

And I think I’ll do the same, Mr. Toastmaster.

 

© Liam Haines – February 1998